Category: A former life …

  • Beyond the IT Service

    Pleased to able to use this blog to present the thoughts of a colleague, Stuart Brown from Oxford Brookes University, who’s been working with other UCISA Director colleagues on our Leadership agenda. We’ve just held our second Directors’ Forum and it was intended that we distributed this paper for comment at the meeting but we were so busy being challenged that the time never materialised. So with Stuart’s full permission here are his personal thoughts – comments are welcomed.

    ====

    This paper attempts to summarise the distinctive features of a new relationship between the information systems and technology operation (IT) and its host organisation. Industry commentators suggest that this change in the position and role of IT is significant across all industry sectors and worldwide. But here our focus is UK Higher Education, which we suppose to be subject to the same trend.

    The impetus for this document has been the UCISA Directors’ Forum, which has exposed some of this new thinking within the sector. The Directors’ Forum is primarily concerned with the implications of these changes for senior IT management. But it has also recognised that many, possibly all IT staff in Higher Education will probably be impacted. To explore this further, initial discussions have been held with the UCISA Staff Development Group (SDG). One conclusion has been that all staff need to understand their place in the big picture. And if the big picture is changing, we need to know what it looks like if staff are to re-orientate themselves successfully.

    This document may be regarded as a sketch of the big picture. In its present form it is doubtless incomplete and may be inaccurate. But it is a starting point. Its is intended that it should be refined and developed with reference to the Directors’ Forum so as to become a guide for future activities, including those of the SDG.

    Game Change: How is the Role of IT Changing?
    IT is moving from a service provider role to that of a full partner in the development and delivery of university strategy .

    This does not mean that service delivery is unimportant – quite the opposite. IT must have a demonstrable record of good quality service delivery to attract the trust and confidence that underpin greater influence.

    Rather than act as a supplier for sponsors drawn from other parts of the organisation, IT must pro-actively sponsor change including changes that impact other parts of the organisation. This may be seen as a change from a “what do you want IT to do?” to a “you must do this” approach.

    This role is risky and requires leadership of high quality. Rapid technology change and poor understanding of IT by non-IT management compound the challenge.

    The extent and pace of these changes varies from one organisation to another, even within the same sector. Only time will tell if this is a general historic shift or localised effect confined to certain organisations.

    Relationship with Senior Management

    1) Procedural
    IT needs to operate IT strategy and governance processes that not only allow it to exert its own influence, but draw together all parts of the organisation in a strategic partnership. These processes must interlock with wider corporate strategy (strategic alignment). The objective is to utilise IT to the greatest effect for the benefit of the organisation. These processes require the active participation of senior management.

    2) Structural
    Senior IT roles must participate fully and influentially in the strategic processes of the organisation. This is often seen as a requirement that the IT Director must report directly to the Chief Executive as well as being a member of the Board of Directors. This is both problematic and contraversial as IT does not have this political position in many organisations, including many in Higher Education.

    Capabilities Required by IT
    In order to fulfil this role as a proactive business change agent, a number of capabilities become important. Some of these are somewhat removed from the capabilities which may be traditionally valued in IT. The extent to which these newly prominent capabilities displace as opposed to supplement established skills and expertise is a moot point.

    Influencing and Communication

    IT tends to cultivate a detailed and technical perspective, which is not appreciated by other professions and disciplines. It is important that IT is able to present itself in a way which accords with the perspective of the rest of the organisation.

    Professional Service Delivery
    As mentioned above, the delivery of well regarded services is essential and this requires high quality professional management (ref. ITIL).

    Business Engagement: IT must exploit and develop its understanding and influence on the organisation through disciplines such as Business Systems Analysis and Business Process Review.

    Sourcing and Procurement
    IT systems and services may be delivered through an increasingly diverse range of options, many of which are essentially outsourced. Expertise in procuring and managing these solutions is increasingly important and may operate at a number of levels from a single system or part of a system right up to the delivery of an entire IT service.

    Project Management
    As the sourcing of solutions becomes more diverse, the role of IT increasingly needs to embrace the overall management of projects involving out-sourced suppliers. In some cases, the internal IT organisation may have relatively little traditional technical input.

  • Twitter – the world is watching?

    I begin by reminding my readers that I’m a simple IT Director; but perhaps not as simple as some, and perhaps more adventurous than most. That’s the disclaimer out of the way.

    I started using brightkite last week, just as a mechanism for seeing whether adding location information to tweets would have any value. I tweeted that it was a shame that my BB with its inbuilt GPS didn’t provide a means of capturing location and feeding it direct to twitter (or whatever) but persisted in telling those that were interetsed that I was moving around Cardiff …. boring. However the idea of updating your profile (in twitter, and potentially in any other system or Web2 2.0 service) of where you are is a potentially very interesting and valuable idea. Indeed, if you take it to its logical conclusion you have links between presence awareness (through GPS and Instant Messaging, or Twitter) and the potential for real face-to-face meetings. That sounds really interesting on a campus as spread out as ours, which is on the edge of a city centre where so much social interaction takes place. So, it’s worthy of further investigation.

    Then yesterday evening I discovered twittermap and twittervision which display in real-time the public twitter stream. It’s a neat mashup using the Google Maps and twitter APIs and you don’t need to do anything to get on it. Just take a look and you’ll see what I mean. You don’t need to do anything, you just start the thing! All of a sudden you see “twitterworld” passing your frontdoor. You see people close (spatially) to you, who you don’t know – tweeting away. You see, in real-time, the conversations on a global scale of all that is going on in twitterworld – some of which you’d not wish to be associated with. In other words – you see the public tweetstream. It’s really neat, and yet it’s really scarey too!

    My first reaction was to come off the public twitter timeline … after all I don’t really want to share anything I’m tweeting with anyone who isn’t following me (as if I felt I had anything worth reading). That would take me off the public twitterstream and therefore (possibly) off any other less-obvious API that was catching my profound utterances through twitter.

    But then I had a chat with my mate – breadedcod.

    Once again the issue is one of education. It’s one of context … Maybe I’d been lulled into a foolish sense of community-security by seeming to be only tweeting to a community that I was controlling [I want to follow X; I don’t want Y following me] I do have to say however that when I decided to follow 10 Downing Street, and the response came back that they were following me …. that really freaked me out!!!!!

    Wake-up call.

    Just reflect that if you’re on the public line and you do  see everything I’ve tweeted. That means (as in twittervision and twittermap) that someone (any supplier, any interest group, any …. whatever), somewhere, could be gathering information and making market intelligence interpretations of everything you tweet.

    Now, I’m not that naive … I did know that twitter was open … honest.

    But …. and this is the crux … I hadn’t done the risk analysis. That’s the one I’d already done when I decided that I needed at least 3 blogging platforms. I’d talked publicly about context, appropriate language, etc etc and although I’d subconsciously applied it to my posts on twitter (I hope there’s nothing that proves me wrong on that one); I hadn’t proactively, and consciously applied the same rules to twitter as I had to my blogging.

    So … this blog is a personal reminder to mself and anyone else that reads it . When using any like-tool to twitter, to remember that the “world is watching”. After receiving the wise counsel of breadedcod, I’m not coming off the public timeline of twitter, pownce, brightkite, jaiku or anything else ….. but I am going to be more circumspect in my tweets – after all my boss might just type in http://twitter.com/diharrison.