OpenID provider confusion

Just discovered that by using different OpenID credentials to a service provider (Twitterfeed) I had effectively created two accounts without realising it. This occurred because they had also changed their user interface which led to an assumption that I’d “lost” my feeds … so I created a new set, with the credentials I had supplied.

So the problem was that there is no cross-validation between accounts by the service provider – good thing; but the user (me) was unaware that I had an account under a different set of OpenID credentials.

This has led me to realise that I must consolidate my use of OpenID to just one provider and look at all the services I get using OpenID credentials and make sure I’m using just that one. So the question is which one should I use?

Should I use Google, or Yahoo – I have accounts with both of them; should I use WordPress or Blogger – same for them too. Or should I use an independent provider? If so, which one? Or should I grasp the nettle and see if I can setup my domain to be an OpenID provider for me and my family.

Advice please?

The end of local democracy as we know it?

It’s been an interesting month for social networking and politics/business/media. Elsewhere @RuthHarrison has drawn attention to the debates surrounding Trafigura and Jan Moir, but something that caught my eye (on Newsnight) was the resignation of the Somerton Councillor’s because of vindictive blogging by Muck&Brass. I’m not going to comment upon the authors style (which is far too personal in places and which should be deprecated), content or methods of drawing attention to what he (and others it would appear) feel about their Council; nor am I going to comment upon the Councillors resignation other to suggest it’s a rather feable response to criticism; what I want to write about is how does the Local Councillor respond to the “crowd”.

Once upon time, everything was so controlled. You knew the editor of the local paper and if something was “not quite right”, or “you needed to get your point of view” across, or “you just wanted to correct a mis-understanding” that had leaked out into the press; you would ring them up and more often than not something would appear in the press, and all would be well with the world.

How does a democratically elected council deal with the “crowd” where they have no way of influencing what is written about them. They could actively participate in the blog, but they’d be at a disadvantage there as politicians are all about “pushing information” rather than shared communication. Collaborative social networking tools are not a happy place for them to be. If it’s their blog … that’s fine! If it’s someone elses … that’s a challenge!

We’ve been well-served by local democracy for centuries. With the rise of the empowered citizen blogger unaffiliated to a political grouping, able to move between causes and campaigns with little thought for the effect they may be causing on local democratic organisation are we in danger of making the Town Council a place that no one would wish to be elected to.

There’s a lot more thought to be put into this. I used to be heavily involved in politics at the “grass roots” as an old Liberal Party member. We worked hard to build consensus and ownership into our local campaigning – what would we have given for twitter or blogging in those days. These tools are now being used by all political parties but nearly always for delivering “the message” and faux consultation. They will struggle if an army of citizen bloggers begins to rise-up who have no allegiances, no sense of responsibility for their actions (other than a professed desire to “do the right thing”), and no real desire to take the place of those that they attack.

This is a concern to me … where does this all lead?